Mayoral Debate essays

Mayoral Debate essays During October 2003, a bug was found in the mayor's office prior to the Philadelphia Mayoral election. Once the bug was found the FBI stated that it was placed in connection with certain investigations but they declined to state the nature of the investigation. That the bug was found so close to the election date has raised the Mayors ire. He has suggested that the bug was apparently planted by the FBI in support of Sam Katz a Republican candidate. Sam Katz refuted these reports and said that it was about time that the corrupt practices of John Street, a first term Democrat candidate was exposed. Suspiciously, a poll that was released after the bugging incident indicated that it probably affected the results making both side of the stories questionable. As a result of this incident, Katz and his opponent John Street found themselves in a debate that was The Street Katz debate' held not only the state but the entire country enthrall. Most of the nation watched the debate as the themes of corruption', television' and politics' always hold a certain entertainment value and as such, a diverse audience found itself following the debate, even if they had previously found nothing of interest where politics was concerned. The language, the style, the argument and the actual rhetoric itself had great import as both the leaders realized that the debate could make or break their careers. Each of the debaters was interested in taking the offensive to ensure a strong argument so that none of the audience saw them as the criminal' party. Politics today is assuredly not a simple job; it's a game that has to be played with all the drama and pomp of a Hollywood movie. Taking this background into account we can accept the words of Katz who says, "All that has gone on in the last couple of weeks puts an exclamation point on basically 100 years of Philadelphia being a city corrupt...