Tartuffe By Moliere Essays - Operas, Tartuffe, Le Tartuffe

Tartuffe By Moliere In Moliere's comedy Tartuffe, we are introduced to the family of Orgon. Orgon is a wealthy man with a beautiful daughter named Mariane. Valere is a man in love with Mariane but the hypocrite Tartuffe gets in the way through manipulation. Throughout the play Orgon is totally dedicated and won over by Tartuffe who adds to the comedy of it all. Throughout, Tartuffe continues to be obviously villainous and yet Orgon continues to trust him with his most precious possessions. Also comical is the fact that Mariane and Valere are in love but this continues to be foiled by Tartuffe's greed and Orgon's stupidity. In the end, Orgon finally discovers that Tartuffe is a fraud but not before he signs all he owns over to him. The comic devices in this story are evident throughout. First, many of the scenes in the play are comical just in the storyline. In scene four Orgon has a conversation with Dorine about the day's events, Dorine tells Orgon of all the trials and tribulations of the day. With each description, Orgon asks about Tartuffe, who is perfectly fine and celebrated with each bad occurrence. Orgon seems to just ignore all the bad news and only be concerned with Tartuffe's well being. This scene becomes even more comical with Dorine following up with a statement about telling Orgon's wife about his ?keen concern.? This sarcasm adds to the comedy. The play really becomes comical in scene one of the second act. It is here that Orgon actually asks his daughter, Mariane to marry Tartuffe. Mariane thinks her father is kidding and even Dorine feels it must be a hoax. Dorine even kids that Mariane ?deserves to be tartuffified.? Dorine however dead set against Tartuffe, continues to work to get Mariane together with Valere against the wishes of Orgon. The comedy continues as we are given an up close and personal view of Tartuffe. In scene two of act three, Tartuffe speaks to Dorine. He actually thinks that Dorine is attracted to him as he really shows his arrogance. It is hysterical when Dorine states that ? if I saw you naked as a beast, Not all your hide would temp me in the least.? But in the next scene, Tartuffe changes his tune and pulls the wool over the eyes of Orgon's wife. He acts genuinely concerned about her health and well being. Then he professes love for Elmire. Unbelievably, he convinces her through flattery not to tell Orgon. The comedy lies in Tartuffe's ability to fool everyone. However Elmire is not as easily fooled as Orgon and his mother Madame Pernelle. The scenes continue to be comical as in scene six of act three where Orgon's son Damis, insults Tartuffe and is thrown out of his own house. The stupidity of Orgon to trust Tartuffe over his own family in unbelievable. Moliere takes the laughter a step further by having Orgon go so far as to sign all his money over to Tartuffe. He says ? Poor fellow! Come, we'll go draw up the deed. Then let them burst with disappointed greed.? Orgon continues to be a fool until act four, scene seven where he finally realizes the greed of Tartuffe and asks him to leave. He is shocked to hear, ?No, I am the master, and you're the one to go! This house belongs to me, I'll have you know.? Orgon has been swindled and it is funny to see how stupid he really was. The play ends when the tables are turned on Tartuffe and he is arrested by order of the King who was on to Tartuffe's terrible ways. Damis reconciles with his father and the wedding of Mariane and Valere is announced. The ending adds to the comic device first in that the tables turn on Tartuffe just when you think he has gotten away with his crime. It is also comical that Orgon just seems to shrug his misfortune away and goes on with his normal routine. Moliere comic devices are not the only things that carry this play. The characters add to the comedy in many ways. Orgon and his mother Madame Pernelle are completely taken with Tartuffe. Orgon is truly a fool who cannot see the obvious right in front of his face. Both he and his mother are so foolish that you want to scream at them to open their eyes. His family must go behind his back to show Tartuffe for the villain he really is.

I Dont Play Golf (An Inspector Calls) Essays

I Dont Play Golf (An Inspector Calls) Essays I Dont Play Golf (An Inspector Calls) Paper I Dont Play Golf (An Inspector Calls) Paper Inspector Goole knocks on the door just when Arthur Birling is making a speech to the rest of the family about how a man has to make his own way so long as he does that he wont come to much harm. He also dismissively mentions that by the way some of these cranks talk and write now, youd think everybody has to look after everybody else. I feel that the reason the Inspector calls at that specific time is to ultimately prove Birling wrong, and try to show him that we are responsible for each other in this world, and how you cannot escape the fact that what goes around, comes around. Birling is quite outraged at the fact that the Inspector has rudely  interrupted their dinner party, and he constantly attempts to tackle  the Inspector with petty little comments: I ought to warn you that  [Colonel Roberts] is an old friend of mine, and that I see him fairly  frequently. We play golf together. Birling continually tries to  intimidate him by mentioning his apparent authority, and patronises  the Inspector look here, Inspector. I consider this uncalled-for  and officious. Ive half a mind to report you. Pompous personality shines through, but the Inspector seems to take it in his stride and merely brushes off the comments that Birling throws at him: I dont play golf. I feel that Priestley decided to portray Arthur Birling as taking the Inspectors arrival quite badly to demonstrate just how shallow and thick-skinned society can be, and how we cannot easily accept our mistakes. The Inspector is the one in the play who brings us back down to Earth and makes us realise that. As well as being the messenger, Inspector Goole is also the strongest character in the play, maintaining complete control of the situation at hand and demonstrating his authority frequently. Its not just his dialect that depicts this, but also his overall persona, which is shown through the stage directions he creates at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness, and it comes across to the audience and reader in an array of different ways. For example, the stage directions repeatedly show the Inspector cutting through massively, cutting in massively, massively taking charge, with authority and taking charge, masterfully. This demonstrates to both the audience and reader that the Inspector has the authority to interrupt people without reason, and take charge of the conversation. He dominates the other characters, even Mr and Mrs Birling, who are used to commanding and others obeying: (As Birling tries to protest, turns on him) Dont stammer and yammer at me again, man. Im losing all patience with you people. After this outburst, Mrs Birling is rather cowed. Aside from his rather terrifying outbursts, the Inspector remains calm and collected throughout the play, though he sometimes speaks coolly and imperturbably. The language he uses is often blunt and sometimes deliberately harsh so as to gain a reaction from the Birlings, reader and audience: Two hours ago a young woman died in the Infirmary. Shed been taken there this afternoon because shed swallowed a lot of disinfectant. Burnt her inside out, of course. This kind of emotive  language is sure to trigger signs of emotion in the Birlings, and once  again illustrates the effect the Inspector is having on the family   once the initial shock has seeped in, the Birlings are too stunned to  deny anything about their involvement with Eva Smith/Daisy Renton, although they did frequently dismiss any knowledge they had about the girl as just coincidence.  However, I felt the Inspector overcame these problems with ease.  The Birlings, especially Mrs Birling, refuse to accept responsibility  for Evas death Im sorry she should have come to such a horrible  end. But I accept no blame for it at all. Realising that she will not  remove herself from this train of thought, the Inspector cleverly  turns the tables on Mrs Birling, luring her into a trap that will  consequently land her son into one of his own: Secondly, I blame the young man who was the father of the child she was going to have.  This, of course, is Eric Birling. Unaware of this, Mrs Birling insists  that the Inspector deals with him very severely, and is glad to  hear it when he grimly agrees with her. When it comes to light that  it is in fact her son who is to blame, Mrs Birling is stunned and  the Inspector has slyly incorporated her into the grisly tale, too. Despite her mothers ignorance, Sheila Birling is perhaps the most  sympathetic of the family. A perceptive character, she is the first to  realise that the Inspector is no ordinary policeman, and that he has  an almost supernatural knowledge: Why you fool he knows. Of  course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we dont know yet. Similarly, she is the first to realise that the father of Evas baby is none other than Eric, and tries to get her mother to  stop insisting that he should be held responsible: (With sudden alarm) Mother stop stop! At the beginning of the play, Sheila is perceived as a character who  is quite contented with her life, and has no reason to worry. However, when the Inspector arrives, her opinions start to change. Sheila regards the Inspector differently from the others she stares at [Inspector Goole] wonderingly and dubiously. She begs her mother not to patronise him You mustnt try to build up a kind of wall between us and that girl as she knows that the Inspector will break it down. She warns her mother He hasnt started on you yet, realising that they are all going to be treated in the same way. Her mood becomes slightly hysterical, also; No, hes giving us the rope so that well hang ourselves. When Arthur Birling remarks that Inspector did not come to talk to me about my responsibilities, Sheila responds, Lets hope not. Though Im beginning to wonder. She seems to be the only one in the family to perceive that the Inspector is not just a police inspector, but a spiritual being or emissary with a  moral mission to punish selfish behaviour among the rich and shallow -in this case, the Birlings. The Inspectors dialogue also leaves quite an impression on the  family, audience and reader especially his final speech. This is the  most important remark the Inspector makes in the entire play, as it  sticks in the minds of everybody, and ultimately sums up his role in  the production.  Priestley has used a lot of emotive language in this specific passage,  such as hopes, fears, suffering, happiness, blood and  anguish. In turn, this causes the Inspectors speech to be quite  blunt, as the sentences that these words are woven into are short,  abrupt and straight to the point mirroring the Inspectors duration  at the Birlings residence. As well as this, the Inspectors speech  makes good use of the word we, uniting the Birlings with the people that they feel they are superior to poor people. By the way that the Inspector declares we are members of one body. We are responsible for each other, he makes clever use of the word are, which in turn finalises the idea that we are members of one body, and we are responsible for one another. It is also contradictory to a section of one of Arthur Birlings speeches: By the way some of these cranks talk and write now, youd think everybody has to look after everybody else which is the complete opposite to what the Inspector is announcing. The passage also anticipates World War One, in the sense that at the very end, the Inspector says if men will not learn that lesson, they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish this, to the Birlings, is a prophetic statement, but the reader and audience are aware of it as it has already come to pass. To emphasise that idea,  the Inspector lengthens the list of words he mentions; instead of just using a comma between fire and blood, he chooses to use and, which sensationalises the comment and makes it sound somewhat more important than if he had just normally listed those specific words.

Effect of Psychological Contract Violation on Organizational Essay

Effect of Psychological Contract Violation on Organizational Commitment, Trust and Turnover Intention in Private and Public Sector Indian Organizations - Essay Example Shahnawaz and Goswami (2011) basically outline the negative outcomes of psychological contract breaches on employers and employees in an organization. Epitropaki (2013: 67) describes an employment contract as a document which can control the activities of employees in an organization, and help them to realize the business goals. Such a contract details what employees are expected of by their employer and the gains that they are entitled to as payment for their effort. On the other hand, Wei and Si (2013: 544) concurs with Shahnawaz and Goswami on the definition of the less formal psychological contract as the beliefs of an individual employee as influenced by the business conditions guiding the interaction between employees and the employer. Alternatively, psychological contract can be construed to mean the perception of individual employees of their duty to their employer and their entitlements (Chiang et al 2012:81). Although, many people view the formal contract as more important to the success of an organization, Shahnawaz and Goswami’s assertion that psychological contract is a mutual commitment which plays an equally pivotal role in forging organizational commitment and the greater productivity is based on scientific evidence (Kraft & Kwantes 2013: 139; (Randmann 2013: 134). But Shahnawaz and Goswami’s argument that it is obvious for either party to fulfill their duty such contracts fails the implementation test. Notably, Zribi and Souaà ¯ (2013: 11) say the understanding of the psychological contract terms between an employee and the organization may be different because both parties have diverse interests and the practice is massively perceptual. Liang and Liu (2014: 56) also note these conflicting understandings of the mutual duties may create an understanding that the other party has reneged on the contractual terms. In addition, employees’ beliefs about of the duti es set up at the

Biology and the body Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Biology and the body - Essay Example l to explain that the female anatomy has been made to support this model where the Vagina is an interior penis, the uterus is the scrotum and the ovaries are the testicles (Laqueur 28). However, this theory of one sex is criticised especially on the womb, which in the ancient times was thought to be the belly, which was common to both men and women. Another theory that Thomas Laqueur put forward and that followed the one sex model is the two sex theory says that the body determines the gender disparities and the female has a completely different anatomy from a male with dissimilar parts of the anatomy functions and feelings. He explained that there is no sex is a monopoly, Laqueur further went ahead and argued that science would only invent new ways of speaking and not to liberate one gender from another, he put out that destiny is anatomy. The film is it a boy or a girl that Phyllis Ward of the intersex society of North America advocates for intersex people goes into deeper analysis on what biologically determines the gender of an individual. The biological differences between the genders help us further understand how the sex of an individual, which is biologically determined before birth, enables one to play his gender role. For instance, what causes a woman to be a woman biologically and how she is wired to perform the activities that involve the gender and her role in sexual intercourse due her having a vagina. The body is at the centre of any understanding regarding gender as the various anatomical processes in the body determine the gender and the anatomical role the gender plays. However according to the one sex model that there exists a monopoly of gender and that the woman was an imperfect man, then it would be accepted that for a man the larger or bigger the penis is the manlier he is presumed to be. However, that idea is fallacious since even in those times of philosopher Aristotle they preferred a small penis, which was thought of as having a higher

Ophelia can be viewed as an insignificant minor character Essay Example for Free

Ophelia can be viewed as an insignificant minor character Essay Ophelia can be viewed as an insignificant minor character in the play through the way she is used as an unwitting pawn in schemes of those who have control over her, as revealed in Act 2 Scene 2 where Polonius says I will loose my daughter to him when he and Claudius plan how they will test Hamlets madness. The word loose objectifies Ophelia, portraying her as an animal used as bait for Claudiuss own objectives; spying on Hamlet. Ophelias character does not have a say in the matter, and through her absence in this particular scene, Shakespeare is able to emphasise her insignificance in the play. Ophelias lack of appearance in the play also portrays her character as minor and insignificant, as Shakespeare only uses her character in 5 scenes. For the majority of these scenes, Ophelia has little contribution to the dialogue and her spoken lines are often responses to questions and commands by others who dominate the play, for example in Act 1 Scene 3 Ophelias responses are short in comparison to her fathers and brothers dialogue, most of which contains instructions on how Ophelia is expected to act; Do not believe his vows Look tot I charge you. Come your ways. The use of imperatives in this scene show how Ophelia is dominated by others and is therefore highlight her insignificance in the play. This is further portrayed in Ophelias responses, such as I shall obey, my Lord. The use of my Lord reveals her inferior status and through minimalistic speech we are able to gain a sense of her unimportance to the action of the play. Another way in which Ophelia may be viewed as insignificant is in her marriage prospects. Her brother Laertes, who suggests that she is not good enough for Hamlet, condemns her relationship with Hamlet, who tells her to regard Hamlets love as something unlikely to last and potentially dangerous: Fear it my dear sister. Hamlet is a prince and therefore Ophelias status makes her inferior in comparison and as a result, an unsuitable wife. Both her brother and father tell Ophelia how to behave, for example Polonius instructs Ophelia to spend less time with Hamlet; Be something scanter of your maiden presence. This dominance over Ophelia, as well as her subservience, again presents her of an insignificant status in the play. Ophelia does not say or do anything to indicate she is unhappy about the instructions given to her by her brother or father. However, another interpretation of Ophelias subservience is that obedience is a role she plays. She is expected to act as a loyal daughter and responses such as But as you did command suggest she is carrying out orders to keep her father content. Shakespeare reveals a weak Ophelia in Act 4 Scene 5 in which she is in a state of madness, through her songs about death, chaos and unrequited love. The poignancy of her songs (He is dead and gone lady, he is dead and gone) as well as the reactions of other characters (Alas sweet lady), induce a piteous reactions, allowing the audience to sympathise with a character who has become so weak it has led to madness. In contrast to her minimalistic speech, in Act 1 Scene 3, Ophelia has dominated the speech. This may suggest that Ophelias character is only of significance when she is in a state of madness. The taboo nature of her songs reveals a character stepping out of the bounds of her social status and this contrasts to how her father has ordered her to act. The death of Polonius may be a cause of Ophelias madness and this is evident when Claudius says Oh this is the poison of deep grief; it springs all from her fathers death. This may suggest that Ophelia becomes weak without the presence of the dominant male authority. Her father is dead, her brother is absent from the country and she has been rejected by Hamlet; without them Ophelia collapses. Shakespeare presents Ophelia as weak in Act 4 Scene 7 where she is unable to save herself: As one incapable of her own distress. The suggestion that Ophelia has committed suicide may have been used by Shakespeare to imply that Ophelias weak state did not allow her to go on living. Shakespeare uses Ophelias character to portray many aspects of Hamlets character, for example Shakespeare is able to reveal Hamlets capability of staggering cruelty through his treatment of Ophelia in the nunnery scene. Shakespeare presents this cruelty through the use of brutal commands and insults such as Get thee to a nunnery. In Act 2 Scene 1 Ophelia presents herself as a victim of Hamlets rough treatment; He took me by the wrist, and held me hard, revealing Hamlets capability of cruelty. There is also evidence of Hamlets cruelty when he embarrasses Ophelia in public, asking her Do you think I meant country matters? Hamlets wit enables him to belittle or mock other characters and the fact that there is little sign of Ophelias character reinforces the idea that she is a minor character. Another thing that is revealed about Hamlet through Ophelia is Hamlets judgment of women. In the nunnery scene, Hamlet accuses Ophelia; You jig, you amble, and you lisp, you nickname Gods creatures, and your make your wantonness your ignorance, revealing his disgust towards women. Shakespeare lists the deceptions to reinforce Hamlets repugnance towards the women in his life. Once again Shakespeare has revealed Hamlets feelings through his words to Ophelia. Ophelias character is also used to portray ideas about other characters, for example when handing out flowers to other characters, Shakespeare develops ideas about the nature of other characters through the type of flower that Ophelia gives to them. For example, one of the flowers she gives out is a daisy, which represents deception an act that could be linked to Claudiuss character. By doing this, Shakespeare is using Ophelia in this scene to indirectly criticise the characters, and the connotations associated with the various flowers would be widely understood by the audience in Shakespeares day. It could be argued that Ophelia is chiefly interesting for reasons other than what she reveals about Hamlet, for example Ophelia is important in the manner in which she illuminates discussion of some of the plays central themes, one of which is the oppression of women in society. Shakespeare presents Ophelia as oppressed through her lack of opinion and contribution in the play. The mere fact that she can be viewed as insignificant shows the audience that Ophelia is oppressed by male authority in the family. Polonius tells Ophelia that she speaks like a green girl, implying that she is nai ve, and this comes across to the audience as patronising. The alliteration of green girl emphasises Poloniuss condescending tone. By belittling Ophelia, he is able to gain control of the conversation. Ophelia is told to think herself a baby, suggesting that she is constrained from using her own mind and must follow the orders given to her. Ophelias character is presented as one with no point of view; as she says I do not know my Lord what I should think. Through statements such as this, Shakespeare reveals an oppressed Ophelia who is unable to think for herself due to the strict control by men in her life. The fact that Ophelia is being used as a pawn in mens political affairs is also a sign that she is being oppressed. When Polonius offers to loose Ophelia, he is taking advantage of her by offering her as a service without her consent. This also portrays Ophelia as a possession that belongs to Polonius. On the other hand, it could be argued that Ophelias character is not oppressed, but in fact in need of male control. In Act 1 Scene 3 Ophelia says I shall theffect of this good lesson keep as watchman to my heart. The use of good implies that the advice is necessary for Ophelias well being and is taken on by her with a positive attitude. When asked by Laertes to remember what she has been told, Ophelia responds by saying Tis in my memory locked, and you yourself shall keep the key of it. This statement also shows Ophelia is willing to take on her brothers advice. This argument can be supported by the idea that Ophelia collapses without her father or brother, and that she in fact benefits by being in their command. Ophelia is also significant as her character is crucial for the plot and setting the scene in the play, for example, in part it is her death that motivates Laertes to take revenge on Hamlet. Another example of the importance of Ophelia in the plot is that her death is used by Shakespeare as a catalyst for confrontation between Hamlet and Laertes.

Essay --

Shelby Meeder English 15 Mr. Goertel December 2013 Ghosts Are ghosts real? That is the question that most of society deliberates day after day. The true definition of a ghost is a soul or spirit of a deceased individual that can appear in visible form or other manifestations to the living. Ghosts are of the most common paranormal belief in the world. Most people believe in ghosts because of a personal experience, whether that was seeing or sensing an unexplained presence. Who wouldn’t want to believe that our beloved family members are looking for us? Along with ghosts comes stories and eyewitnesses. When it comes to solid proof, the paranormal world does not have a good history. The only evidence to reported paranormal experience is eyewitnesses or pictures. Every domain of the paranormal relies deeply on the testimony of eyewitnesses. â€Å"The testimony of an eyewitness will often be the only evidence offered in a court of law† (Chambers). If an eyewitness is acceptable in a court of law, then why can’t it be acceptable for an apparition? On September 19, 1936, the â€Å"brown lady† was sighted yet again. Colonel Loftus was visiting Raynham Hall in England for the holidays when he saw the brown lady. He told others of his experience and more people then came forward to say they too had seen a strange figure. Soon after this experience, a photo was captured. The photo of the brown lady is â€Å"believed to be one of the best and most convincing of all known ghosts photos† (Dennis & Cohen). Another ghost sighting happened in 1919, of the Goddard’s squadron which had served in WWI. A photo was taken of the squadron, and an extra ghostly face appears in the back of the airman placed in the top row. This figure is said to be Fr... ... Lukach, Adam. "Ghost Hunting: With Zak Bagans." Chicago Tribune 30 Oct. 2012: 33. Print. Schlosser, S. E. "Axe Murder Hollow: From Ghost Stories at Americanfolklore.net." Axe Murder Hollow: From Ghost Stories at Americanfolklore.net. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Dec. 2013. . "Top 10 Scariest Places in the US." Fox News. FOX News Network, 22 Oct. 2013. Web. 4 Dec. 2013. . Wagner, Stephen. "Freddy Jackson." About.com Paranormal Phenomena. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Dec. 2013. . Wagner, Stephen. "The Back Seat Ghost." About.com Paranormal Phenomena. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Dec. 2013. .

Criticism on the Novel Essay

Nature setting are explicit Page 30: â€Å"When I was about fifteen years old we had retired to our house near Belrive, when we witnessed a most violent and terrible thunderstorm. It advanced from behind the mountains of Jura, and the thunder burst at once with frightful loudness from various quarters of the heavens. I remained with curiosity and delight. As I stood at the door, on a beautiful oak which stood about twenty yards from our house; and so soon as the dazzling light vanished, the oak had disappeared, and nothing remained but a blasted stump. [†¦] It was not splintered from the shock, but entirely reduced to thin ribbons of wood.† Foreshadowing?: power of electricity sparks his attention, if it can destroy something so quickly, why can’t it bring dead flesh to life? Scientific descriptions lack important information Page 48: â€Å"It was already one in the morning; the rain pattered dismally against the panes, and my candle was nearly burnt out, when, by the glimmer of the half-extinguished light, I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open; it breathed hard, and a convulsive motion agitated its limbs.† We see how she was a poet in this quote: she gives more descriptions of the surroundings than the scientific aspect of which many people long for. Obviously shows the lack of knowledge displayed by Mary Shelly. Countries are â€Å"close together† Shows once again how much knowledge Mary Shelly had regarding geography. It sparks attention when she says that it takes longer to go from Geneva to Ingolstadt (a total of 413.6 miles) than it is to go to England. Monster has superhuman abilities yet he is made from human parts Page 70: â€Å"I thought of pursuing the devil, but it would have been in vain, for another flash discovered him to me hanging among the rocks of the nearly perpendicular ascent of Mont Saleve, a hill that bounds Plainpalais on the south. He soon reached the summit and disappeared.† Stereotyping of the Turkish and Irish people If Frankenstein had already created a monster, why did he need help from some other scientists for the creation of another monster? Page 153: â€Å"I found that I could not compose a female without again devoting several months to profound study and laborious disquisition. I had heard of some discoveries having been made by an English philosopher, he knowledge of which was material to my success [†¦]† The Monster tells Frankenstein how he’s survived mobs throwing rocks and several other projectiles and such, yet Frankenstein never stops trying to think he can kill the monster. Page 206: â€Å"[†¦] the monster whom I had created, the miserable demon whom I had sent abroad into the world for my destruction. I was possessed by a maddening rage when I thought of him, and desired and ardently prayed that I might have him within my grasp to wreak a great and signal revenge on his cursed head.† All quotes from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein